Opinion

OPINION | BP’s big problem: Its own board

Listen to this article
-00:00
Subscribers can listen to this article
UK North Sea accounted for 5% of BP’s output last year.
UK North Sea accounted for 5% of BP’s output last year. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

BP is seeking ⁠to transform its strategy and culture. An unreliable board could make that already tough challenge well-nigh impossible, writes Ron ‌Bousso.

BP is seeking ⁠to transform its strategy and culture. An unreliable board could make that already tough challenge well-nigh impossible, writes Ron ‌Bousso.

The sudden ousting of BP chairman Albert Manifold over allegations of misconduct less than eight months after he took office plunges the British energy giant into its second leadership ‌scandal in less than three years. These repeated leadership misfires suggest BP’s board is quickly ⁠becoming a liability.

His departure is related to aggressive conduct towards BP staff, which came to light following a whistleblower complaint, according to sources ⁠close to the board. Manifold was hired to oversee the company’s strategic transformation and reestablish investor confidence in the board following a disastrous foray into renewables after 2020 under former CEO Bernard Looney and Manifold’s predecessor Helge Lund. Looney was fired in late 2023 after it was revealed that he had affairs with colleagues. Lund departed after shareholder support plummeted.

The former head of a ‌construction company was expected to bring a hard-nosed approach to the business – and he did just that.

His unwavering focus on profitability helped propel BP’s impressive revamp under Looney’s successor Murray Auchincloss and Chief Financial Officer Kate Thomson. They shifted back to oil and gas operations, shedding most renewables and low-carbon businesses while also cutting thousands of jobs and selling $15 billion ‌of assets in 2025 alone.

Manifold wasted no time in making his presence felt.

First came a change of leadership. In December, two months after Manifold joined BP, Auchincloss was replaced with Meg O’Neill, the former CEO of Woodside Energy, an outsider and the first woman to lead a major oil company. Then in February, several weeks before O’Neill took office, BP suspended its share buyback programme, giving the company much-needed breathing room to reduce its debt pile.

The two moves ‌were largely welcomed by investors who appeared ⁠to view them as proof of BP’s – and Manifold’s – clear intentions. The surge in oil prices since the start of the Iran war further buoyed BP, helping its profits in the first three months of the year to more than double from a year earlier to $3.2 billion - the highest since 2023.

From an operations perspective, BP is today in a far better place than it was a few years ago. Manifold’s abrupt departure is unlikely to change BP’s strategic direction or force any changes to its executive leadership under O’Neill.

But the company’s board will now move into the spotlight.

Even though Manifold has been with the company for under a year, his actions and dismissal revive questions over the board’s culture that were brought to the fore amid Looney’s sudden departure and the firm’s strategic missteps. He sought to address those exact concerns by revamping and trimming the board in recent months, bringing in experienced ⁠oil and gas executives. The changes would “allow for faster decision-making and sharper oversight, both of which are critical to driving long-term shareholder value," Manifold said in March.

The words ring hollow today.

When announcing Manifold’s appointment in July, the board said it followed a “rigorous and comprehensive global search.”

“Albert has a relentless focus on performance which is well suited to bp’s needs now and into the future,” senior independent board director Amanda Blanc said at the ⁠time.

In BP’s statement on Tuesday, Blanc acknowledged Manifold had helped bring “a welcome focus” to BP’s transformation, but said that the board had been “surprised and disappointed” to learn of Manifold’s “governance oversight and conduct issues it deems unacceptable and has taken decisive action.”

Given the board’s recent track record, BP shareholders and staff will be right to question the prior due diligence and any assurances about the selection process for the future chair or other senior appointments.

BP is seeking ⁠to transform its strategy and culture. An unreliable board could make that already tough challenge well-nigh impossible.

Ron ‌Bousso is a columnist for Reuters.

News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.

Disclaimer: News24 cannot be held liable for any investment decisions made based on the advice given by independent financial service providers. Under the ECT Act and to the fullest extent possible under the applicable law, News24 disclaims all responsibility or liability for any damages whatsoever resulting from the use of this site in any manner.

3989

Ron Bousso